>>4154568 (lb)

>Everything you read has it's own bias and omissions. DiGenova's interview has multiple data points that fit into the evidence we already have, making it more likely or not to be credible.

everything I 'read' ??? you fucking moron, how would you know what I have read and what I haven't? Or what the source of what I read was? How about actual DoJ documents, outlining the timeline of where he was, when, and cases he was involved in for starters?

Fucking small-minded or an npc, either way you don't belong here if that (fucking pundit interivew?!? really?!?) is the best argument you can put up Don't bother - you're only going to end up hurting yourself. You clearly need your opinion given to you because coming up with one on your own would be too much effort.

>>4154535 (lb)

one of my favorite telltale signs is attempting to 'convince' me by linking me to some youtube video of an interview with 'muh-trusted-pundit' spinning a narrative.

Nevermind that I wouldn't have opinions or theories that run against the grain if I only had 'interview videos' and 'pundit-opinions' as the basis for my suspicions.

So few people seem capable of actually forming an independent opinion. :\

NPC's are a thing - and they're very, very real.

sad.

>>4154680

In other news, water is wet. More at 11, back to you tom.

>>4154691

so I may have banged an immortal satanist.

I'm strangely good with that.

>>4154834

nah.

wrong one brah

>>4154692

That you're here at all, attempting to convince others of what you know to be wrong says everything.

Were we all being so mislead, nobody would give a runny taco bell shit about what we said or did.

>>4154960

you're assuming we're talking about the same thing

>>4155055

I question the authenticity of your posts and intent - if you'd read anything I wrote, I don't really know where this entire thread of conversation would be a reasonable or likely natural progression.

have a good evening shill.

>>4155126

You clearly don't remember how badly the MSM and usual talking heads lost their shit with Trump idly talking about something like this a few years back?

Besides, a state-ran media org would only set a very, very bad precedent which would only be useful up until the moment Trump leaves office, after which it too would be weaponized against us.

Or do you 'like' the wording of the UN migration compact?

>>4155275

probably has to do with Tax returns.

https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1070128923957186560

Mueller on Flynn:

"Given the defendant’s substantial assistance and other considerations set

forth below, a sentence at the low end of the guideline range—including a sentence that does not impose a term of incarceration—is appropriate and warranted."