Thank you for the tasty bread
Dear anons, please be wary of information such as this from the last bread
>>415561
>>415577
>>415586
>>415603
some of the claims are NOT backed up and quite frankly are physically impossible.
In particular the claim to be able to "read brain waves at a distance"
In order to transmit or receive radio waves you need an antenna. The efficiency of the antenna is directly related to its size in relationship to the wavelength. The best antenna has a length equal to the wavelength in question. You can get around this when transmitting by using extra power. But when you are trying to receive a signal anything less than 10% of the wavelength isn't going to work very well. The exception is the phased array, But even there the receiver nodes must be a significant fraction of a wavelength appart.
The reason I've gone through all of that is brain waves are between 3 and 50 Hz. The wavelength of a 10Hz radio wave is 30,000Km.
Physics alone make remote reception of brain waves difficult and the fact that the source is 0.5milliWatts which a very, very low powered signal to begin with means you'd need an efficient antenna just to begin to receive the signal.
Flip side,
there is evidence for transmitting to an individual in the way of scientific studies that show the effect of putting a voice in their head via radio waves or focused acoustic waves.
In both of these cases (receive brain waves or transmit voices) I mean for individuals that do not have implanted devices.
If they've got an implanted device all bets are off,
dubito ergo cogito ergo sum
>cia own largest sattelite ever made, antenna over 300 ft wide, aimed at earth, its part of project orion
interdasting….
you do realize there is one major reason that reading brainwaves from orbit is impossible don't you?
>very low frequency radio waves don't penetrate the ionosphere, they bounce back toward earth, ask any HAM operator
>Familiar with Fourier transforms?
>So let's not rule it out quite yet, OK?
actually I have heard of FFT,
>I'm pretty sure you would be aware that when multiple frequencies are present, there can be modulation products that are sum, difference, multiples, harmonics,
with more than one signal present how similar do the amplitudes of the signals need to be before this digital signal processing technique is effective?
and you do realize that the effects of sum / difference and harmonics only happen in a mixer circuit and DO NOT happen in free space waves
>low frequencies can be embeded in higher,
yes a high frequency signal can be modulated with an "envelope" that is a low frequency signal
and this is the exact technique used to transmit voices in the head type signals
mood alteration can be done with subsonics
I've yet to see any plausible method of implanting thoughts
>Well, they're doing SOMEthing with it.
no doubt they are doing something with it, I just very much doubt it's reading brainwaves
I didn't mean to insult (well slightly)
as that map applies to me as well
I've been in the industry since 1985 when I got my 1st FCC license and there are things I know I don't know