Anonymous ID: 7b4add Dec. 4, 2018, 8:08 p.m. No.4157682   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7706 >>7743

Someone on twitter claiming 66K indictment list is way way off.

Any lawfags on here that can counter these claims, that people searching Pacer for sealed indictments used wrong search criteria?

Has this been hashed out already?

 

https://twitter.com/DaniloBlandon79/status/107016038265479987

Anonymous ID: 7b4add Dec. 4, 2018, 8:18 p.m. No.4157846   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7937

>>4157815

The issue is the claim that the Pacer search was using wrong search criteria - and thus, the indictments are inflated.

 

https://wmerthon6.wixsite.com/website-1/home/comprehensive-analysis-of-the-50k-sealed-indictment-claim