Anonymous ID: 3fbee4 Dec. 5, 2018, 6:42 a.m. No.4163807   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3817 >>3821 >>3862 >>3872 >>3987

>>4163735 (lb) Martial Law can't be declared without interfering with the civilian court system. The questions LG asked Kavanaugh give insight into what will be coming before the SC when some of these people get put before a tribunal. Some of the specific situations of them and their acts have never been before a Court so it will have to be asked and answered

Anonymous ID: 3fbee4 Dec. 5, 2018, 6:48 a.m. No.4163862   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3887 >>4011

>>4163821 I meant can not can't be declared

>>4163817 Martial Law does not guarantee removing the civilian court system. It can still operate under Martial Law unless something catastrophic were to happen

>>4163807 what you are talking about is or entire civilian system being rendered defunct. Yes that is one absolute condition of military tribunals for civilians that would not use the SC

Anonymous ID: 3fbee4 Dec. 5, 2018, 7:10 a.m. No.4164129   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4164

>>4163957

civilian courts are used for either civilians OR military personnel but military courts are for military personnel unless special circumstances exist. It has to be a complete breakdown of the system. Not just the idea of corrupt judges because they would be innocent until proven guilty. a good example would be if BHO birth Cert was false. Every Judge he put on the bench would be void. (329) every prosecutor he appointed would be too. Our system would be so over burdened that it could not provide due process to defendants or conduct daily business. As far as military tribunals for this period in time, we are acting under the authorization for use of military force . Here is an easy read for the situation. http://www.crf-usa.org/america-responds-to-terrorism/military-tribunals.html

Anonymous ID: 3fbee4 Dec. 5, 2018, 7:14 a.m. No.4164182   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4163872

the 65K cases are not individual cases. They are court actions. many are individual subpoena request like we saw with the recent unsealing. But in any case, the number will be large and many judges will have to recuse themselves because of who the defendant is. No way to know the scope right now . It is possible that the number of judges left to handle the cases causes a constitutional problem requiring Military Courts to engage