Gais… in my digging on my timeline map thingymajig, I ran across this site:

http:// www.larouchepub.com/other/2013/4031mb_hms.html

Tons of fun stuff, in here - but of particular interest to me (since I know most of the prior stuff, but have been looking for collaborating evidence and generally setting my memory straight), were some paragraphs at the end.

To quote:

" In July 1998, a former British MI5 officer, David Shayler, revealed that in February 1996, British security services financed and supported a London-based Islamic terrorist group, in an attempted assassination of Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi. Then-British Foreign Secretary Malcolm Rifkind, in an interview with the British Daily Mail, sanctioned the action. Speaking to the BBC on Aug. 5, 1998, Shayler said: "We paid £100,000 to carry out the murder of a foreign head of state. That is apart from the fact that the money was used to kill innocent people, because the bomb exploded at the wrong time. In fact, this is hideous funding of international terrorism."

The Saudis complained several times to the British authorities about the activity of the expatriate Mohammed al-Massari, who called for the overthrow of the House of Saud, and asked for his extradition with particular insistence. He was rumored to be allied to Osama bin Laden, who apparently was maintaining a residence in the wealthy London suburb of Wembley. According to the same sources, London is also the headquarters of bin Laden's Advise and Reform Commission, run by Khaled al-Fawwaz. "

Still looking for some feedback on my format, here.

I am working mostly with default colors and settings in the program, but I should hope the pattern of what I am going for is starting to emerge. By no means are these complete, the goal is to fill in with additional pertinent information and to build timelines and connection maps for persons of interest.

Thoughts, criticisms, or other input before I make a dedicated bread to the task?

>>416914

Going from analog systems to digital systems, the biggest difference is that you can almost literally create bandwidth anywhere you want within a digital system. There are restrictions, sure, but if the repeating station is more advanced than the receiving stations, then you can embed digital modulation within analog signals that would pass right by the analog hardware. You can frequency modulate an AM signal, Amplitude Modulate a FM signal, use sidebands that are normally excluded from analog systems. Depending upon hardware, you can set it to process a very wide frequency band that an analog system would never be tuned to use, and split a data stream across several analog bands.

If we are talking FPGAs and DSPs, then you're looking at the microwave spectrum being open to software the same way the sound spectrum is open to a sonar operator. You are just down to the memory and bandwidth capabilities of your hardware.

>>417067

I'm less inclined to go with a chip theory at the moment. This requires a lot of overhead and infrastructure that … eh. I believe Q. I also believe physics. There are serious engineering challenges with mind-control chips that can be overcome, sure - but not to the degree that I can plug a chip into you with a vaccine. To me, that is people trying too hard to come up with a reason to justify their right to not be forced to get a medical procedure done to them.

We know that certain people are very sensitive to electromagnetic fields. Perhaps this correlates with individuals who have certain mental illnesses. RF, LF, and ELF leaks from poor grounding and terminal connections in homes or office spaces is a major factor in reports of paranormal activity.

Let's say I can hack your phone and drop an FPGA program into your phone's hardware. When it is activated, RF is emitted from the phone that a subject may be sensitive to. Hence 'hearing voices.' If they are the type of person who is vulnerable to these sensations, and those sensations can be 'trained' to exhibit 'commands' - while he, himself, has been trained to follow through with those commands… you don't have a "separate personality" - you have a set of "command routines" that a person is conditioned to be receptive to that can be triggered by an external stimuli.

Big ifs on those. I can't point you to any specific research or anything. Just how I would go about an MK-Ultra type program in this day and age, knowing what I do know about the human body, neurology, psychology, and technology.

The 'command routines' are similar to hallucinations that draw upon memories and other such things - people who have an inhibited ability to differentiate between a memory or 'internal voices' and 'external voices' (schizophrenia), compounded with a sensitivity to RF could be conditioned to remember certain lines of dialogue under the influence of RF. Thus - command sequences. Conditioning the person to be sensitive and receptive to commands - to simply do what the voices say, means you have an MK-Ultra style candidate. It can't be done on just anyone. There will be a limited availability of the pool of candidates (was this guy primary material… or a last-ditch effort… he has a hurricane trail around him and got captured alive).

>>417140

You all are thinking way too complex. You need controlled standing/scrolling waves to start to get into "reading" or "broadcasting" brains. A helmet.

This is unnecessary. Keep in mind the Q mentions mental illness. This is important. In particular, Schizophrenics are interesting in their impaired ability to discern an internal thought/idea from an external one. The neurology is a little interesting - but you can think of it as being an overflow of subconscious thoughts/ideas on the periphery overflowing into other parts of the brain and being processed as sensory inputs.

This is a key factor that, were I such an engineer, would be looking to exploit. The fact that these people can remember things and not fully realize it is a memory. You then select for RF/ELF sensitivity and train sensitive candidates to recall certain sets of dialogue when under RF/ELF illumination (perhaps this can be tuned to a certain pattern… perhaps they could freak the hell out if they walk under a street transformer… I don't know).

You then train them to act on these 'voices' and to be pliable and agreeable to their suggestions. By doing this, you create a situation where an individual has 'commands' that are stored that can then be activated, while they are trained to do as those voices compel.

Critical is that these commands are put in place ahead of time. Weeks. Months. Years. These aren't something broadcast to the brain, they are something triggered by the presence of electromagnetic fields. Only a small number of people will be candidates for this type of thing, relative to the general population.

Curiously, I am not sure how this would have been prompted in people prior to the widespread deployment of cellular phones. Theoretically, your phone could be loaded with an FPGA routine that would cause it to radiate in a frequency (or harmonic thereof) that a subject is vulnerable to. Going much further back, some other triggering mechanism would need to exist. Perhaps auditory signals or a more direct approach to radiating a subject was used ("radio gun").