Re Q crumbs. Not sure if already posted.
"The overwhelming evidence points to the signal largest common factor in all of these incidents is the fact that all of the perpetrators were either actively taking powerful psychotropic drugs or had been at some point in the immediate past before they committed their crimes."
Sauce:
https:// ammoland.com/2013/04/every-mass-shooting-in-the-last-20-years-shares-psychotropic-drugs/
Q said 'no coincidences' but to be honest I don't fully believe every word Bill Cooper said. I think he's right on many subjects but at the same time I think he's also wrong on some. For example the UFO phenomenon, which - according to him - is man-made but then there are these old (even ancient) artworks, writings and so on which 'prove' him wrong.
I always thought that Bill was a bit crazy or maybe started to believe in stories he made up. Not all, but some. It's a known phenomenon that a lot of contactees or people who speak up sort of get bored by telling the same story over and over and over again and then start to change it a bit. I do not want to discredit Bill Cooper. Please be aware of that. I just always had my doubts about him. And then Q sort of confirms he's legit. I'd like to know on what subjects he's right. All?
That I understand anon. But if a source isn't a 100 percent legit it will always weaken any story based on that particular source. Opponents will say: "He's wrong on this and that so you can't base your story on him." That's what I worry about. We all know how 'they' are.