I suspect that Russia is going to cooperate bigly in this and ship every one of those people over here so they can get put on the stand and testify as to exactly WHO they were dealing with and WHO was calling the shots, along with what their specific instructions were.
POTUS has a plan
Still working on this:
What [3] scientists were killed who were researching the SAT relay of mobile phone signals to end users?
Why was the research deemed CLASSIFIED?
Learn.
Q
So we're looking at 1986 to 1988, in which 6 men got killed, all working for Marconi Systems. The key people from a project covering design, software and hardware.
The subject of their research was a [ SAT relay ] of [ high frequency radio signals ] to [ the end user ] (target).
Keeping in mind that this was a military research club (advanced stuff) and we were still in the infancy of going from analog signals to digital processing. From wiki:
The Motorola DSP56000 (also known as 56K) is a family of digital signal processor (DSP) chips produced by Motorola Semiconductor (later known as Freescale Semiconductor, now acquired by NXP) starting in 1986 and is still being produced in more advanced models in the 2010s. The 56k series was quite popular for a time in a number of computers, including the NeXT, Atari Falcon030 (56001), and SGI Indigo workstations. Upgraded 56k versions are still used today in audio gear, radars, communications devices (like mobile phones) and various other embedded DSP applications.
1986, It's hard going back in time, mentally. The problem is figuring out what was so damn important back then that they'd (literally) kill off a project to keep anyone from knowing about it.
[ SAT relay ] of [ high frequency radio signals ] to [ the end user ]
Knowing Q's propensity for dual meanings and carefully disguised hints, I'm still wondering about the meaning of "SAT".
What does a relay do to a RF signal? A relay has both an input and output functions. It takes the (input) attenuated signal, cleans it up, boosts the power and rebroadcasts it (output). So what if it was a [SAT relay] was a [Signal Amplification Transducer relay] that allowed another signal to be added to the signal stream as a sideband, using the existing signal as the carrier wave to take the "piggybacked" signal to the end user?
Who would know? Completely covert communication using existing RF signals. All that's necessary is the digital processing to successfully separate out the hidden signal for the end user.
OK, going a bit further. What if the cell phone is the SAT relay and the end user (target) is either an implant or the human brain itself?
Then we have the opposite function. The input signal is digital and the SAT strips away everything except a specific output signal, boosts the power and broadcasts it. The entire function is going to be buried in the digital signal processing (DSP) chip, but coupled to that function we also have to have a broadcast function.
Following this line of thought and back to another Q drop, what did the Blackberry NOT have that the iPhone, Samsung and Google phones all have? In particular, something that would facilitate a low frequency signal (target=implant) or an ELF signal (target=brain)
Another way of saying it is to mirror the question.
What did the Blackberry NOT have that the other phones HAVE?
What did the Blackberry HAVE that the other phones do NOT have?
Perhaps that makes the problem easier to look at. As part of the high security of the Blackberry, I'm looking for a broadcast signal that the other phones have but the Blackberry did not have. If that signal could be nailed down, I think we can determine what the [end user] actually is.
And, as far as why the phones being made in China is important, it would be easy to have some special runs of various phones made at the factory using different chipsets that are (almost) OEM and indistinguishable from any other phones of the same make and model but with a different capability.
This is turning into one deep damn rabbit hole.
Any assistance is appreciated.
Anon, do you have a forest =/= trees thing going?
I know all about the shift from analog to digital and it was in researching that and working with it that these guys discovered something that was so important that they were all killed to cover it up. Going with the theory that we've got the right guys, the fact that it included Design/Hardware/Software means it was a new thing and since several killed were on the software side of the house I'd say it's mostly software driven.
What we're doing here is trying to do the forensic work to figure out what that might have been that they developed.
What is the real difference between analog signals processing and digital signal processing?
The digital is nothing but ones and zeros and multiple "signals" can all be bound together in one. Add a bit of encryption and it's impossible to tell what is actually there. That was my point about having a covert communication system in plain sight. During the signal processing, the covert signal is stripped out (transducer function) for communication or other purpose. I'm now at the point of thinking that the "AHA" moment for someone was what would happen if you ran that process in reverse. That is what I was describing.
In conjunction with what I just posted, Q also said:
Have any recent [shooters] received therapy in the past?
Be the autists we know you are.
You were chosen for a specific reason.
Q
That's an interesting question.
"Have any recent [shooters] received therapy in the past?
Why didn't Q simply ask if the shooters had received therapy?
Why ask specifically whether any recent [shooters] received therapy in the past?
That points to a separation of time between the therapy and the shooting. How much time? We don't know.
Q also said, about the individuals selected to be schoolhouse shooters.
Target subjects are pre disposable to certain mental illnesses.
Target subjects are scouted over a period of time to study and arrange 'THERAPY'.
"THERAPY" takes [x] to break the mind into a functional/programmable device.
Science Fiction?
Q
So, the THERAPY takes [x] and uses [x] to break the mind into a functional/programmable device.
What does the "Science Fiction?" question point to? I'm guessing something electrical in nature. Science fiction has always been about building machines that do things we could never do, and Q said the [x] would break the mind into a functional/programmable device. Functional/programmable device is a machine and machines have controls.
So, yes, I know some of you don't like the idea of implants WRT mind control, but that seems to be exactly what Q is pointing to. Yes, Q is also pointing at drugs as well, which says to me that it's both.
The drugs do several things. First, they create the environment in which the shooter will automatically be dismissed as a whacko and the REAL problem is the guns. The poor thing was mentally ill, the proof is he (why are there never any female shooters?) was on meds for his mental illness!
Second, the drugs create the mental condition (altered state - hypnotic) conducive to the mind control to work. Working with the implant certain stimuli can be achieved, they're triggered, they listen to the "voices in their head" and do what they're commanded to do.
I think this combination puts them in a state in which they can be programmed (hypnosis/voices in the head) to function as a machine. A killing machine. Tell mama you love her and put 3 rounds in the back of her head, two in her face and one in her heart. That's pretty fucked up and requires some serious control.
I've seen too many statements of the shooters who described the voices in their head telling them to kill.
So, I'm questioning how this works. What mechanism is at work?
This is how I see it right now.
The drugs create the brain state and allow the programming/functioning.
The implant provides the trigger control that allows a great deal of control.
The cell phone (RF signal) provides a way to eliminate the distance issue in terms of the target subject and the handler controlling the op.
Possibly the cell phone is the power source for the implant using broadcast RF energy. Remove the cell phone and the implant has no power source and cannot be detected. The implant can be injected easily (they're really tiny) at any time prior and not used until necessary. Years prior.
What if vaccines really do have chips? What if it's not a conspiracy theory?
The cell phone can be individually targeted to receive the signals, the signals cannot go astray and possibly be detected. This signal could come from the cellular network or from some other transmitter operating on that frequency. That could be locally (think the Stingray devices) or possibly even via satellite transmission (think Iridium).
We have two unknowns. One is the implants (if there are implants) and the other is the cell phones.
The other phones have something the blackberry did not have and I think they broadcast RF energy in some way that could either power an implant of affect the brain.
In other words, you can have a covert communication system in plain sight.
But what if you ran it in reverse and used the repeater to strip out everything except the signal you wanted? Could a cell phone function to do that?
>Add in the software to fine-tune the programming and you have the formula to implant thoughts into weak, susceptible minds.
That's what the drugs are for, to produce the susceptible, suggestible mind that's already in a hypnotic state.
I wonder what could be delivered via earbuds?
Well, that's more like it.
I'm actually more of a pharmanon but have experience with implants. Can't say more, I just know you can do a shit-ton with them.
>Curiously, I am not sure how this would have been prompted in people prior to the widespread deployment of cellular phones. Theoretically, your phone could be loaded with an FPGA routine that would cause it to radiate in a frequency (or harmonic thereof) that a subject is vulnerable to. Going much further back, some other triggering mechanism would need to exist. Perhaps auditory signals or a more direct approach to radiating a subject was used ("radio gun").
They knew cell phone networks were in the pipeline, they were waiting on the rollout of production to get it all in service.
I'll have to think about this, but I can tell you that the microbiome has a LOT to do with schizophrenia and that is directly impinged by overuse of antibiotics.
Hang on now… there are some other anons providing great input. And if we got some anons who had their autism oriented in this direction we might really start cooking with gas.
I just got all the feedback I needed to KNOW I'm on the right track.
>I had a nightmare last night that woke me up.
>Somebody asked me to design a system to put RF energy into someone's skull at 4-30 Hz.
Sorry about that Anon. I asked my magic 8 ball to activate the almonds of anyone who could help me with this.