Yeah, ya'll made your point.
I think the way that conspiracy theories are REALLY discredited is not by simply labeling them as such, but coming up with boatloads of really wacky supermarket-checkout-line-tabloid theories, the effect of which is to overwhelm and drown out legitimate question and concerns.
The JFK assassination has to be looked at all over again from scratch, stripping away the gloss of all the wild theories that have been added on over the years. The Warren Commission focused on chasing extraneous bullshit, intentionally IMO (think Clowns), and neglected to address the most basic and obvious questions of the murder.
Just prior to the release of the Warren Commission Report in 1964, Bertrand Russell wrote a paper, "16 Questions on the Assassination." Most, if not all, of the questions remain unanswered (number 4 is especially glaring):
____
-
Why were all the members of the Warren Commission closely connected with the U.S. Government?
-
If, as we are told, Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin, where is the issue of national security?
-
If the Government is so certain of its case, why has it conducted all its inquiries in the strictest secrecy?
-
Why did the Warren Commission not establish a panel to deal with the question of who killed President John F. Kennedy?
-
Why have so many liberals abandoned their own responsibility to a Commission whose circumstances they refuse to examine?
-
Why did the authorities follow many persons as potential assassins and fail to observe Oswald’s entry into the book depository building while allegedly carrying a rifle over three feet long?
-
Why was the President’s route changed at the last minute to take him past Oswald’s place of work?
-
Why has the medical evidence concerning the President’s death been altered out of recognition?
-
What is the evidence to substantiate the allegation that the President was shot from behind?
-
Why has the FBI refused to publish what could be the most reliable piece of evidence in the whole case [photographs taken of JFK’s vehicle just before and during the shooting]?
-
How is it that millions of people have been misled by complete forgeries [of photos of the murder weapon] in the press?
-
Why was the result of the paraffin test altered before being announced by the authorities?
-
Why was the only description of Tippit’s killer deliberately omitted by the police from the affidavit of the sole eyewitness?
-
Why was Oswald’s description in connection with the murder of Patrolman Tippit broadcast over Dallas police radio at 12:43 p.m. on November 22, when Tippit was not shot until 1:06 p.m.?
-
How was it possible for Earl Warren to forecast that Marina Oswald’s evidence would be exactly the reverse of what she had previously testified?
-
How does a District Attorney of Wade’s great experience account for all the extraordinary changes in evidence and testimony which he has announced during the Oswald case?
____
I know I'm getting far afield here with this and I won't litter up the board further, but part of the transparency Trump is bringing to us must eventually FULLY ADDRESS the JFK assassination. I'm hopeful it will happen in my lifetime. I've been waiting for 55 years, so patience is one of my few virtues.
The motto of this ship was "Don't Fiddle with the Biddle."
Yes I have. But I think this first need to be treated as a murder investigation. Solve the murder first, then tackle the more complex issues. This was never done.
I'll tell you this: review ALL of the information available open source, and you—and I believe any jury—will come to the conclusion that Oswald was on the FIRST floor of the TSBD near the front entrance as the motorcade passed by—just like he said he was. Establish this as fact, then that means he wasn't on the SIXTH floor, and the ENTIRE official case against Oswald unravels. If the case against Oswald unravels, then the whole phony BS edifice comes down.
This will happen, eventually. Hopefully sooner rather than later.
It's never too late for justice.