>another anon asserted they were fake medical records.
And this anon asserts they are not fake.
Which one is right?
Who provided sauce?
I think you missed my point anon.
This is actually the first time I've seen that doc. It could well be genuine, could well be fake, I don't know. I'm just a random anon on a board and anything I say without sauce should be treated with sceptisim. That is the British form of the word that means incredulous but open to the possibility with sufficient evidence. I provided none and it appears neither did the anon claiming it was fake.
Noice!