Anonymous ID: b1e995 Dec. 5, 2018, 6:07 p.m. No.4174979   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5134

>>4174877

But why would you broaden the concept?

In an environment [here] where FAKENESS often dominates, arbitrarily broadening concepts pertaining to fakeness would seem to run you the risk of muddying the waters. Surely you want us to be vigilant about fakeness here, right anon? You don't want to CONFUSE the issue by bizarrely changing the meanings of words? That would be insane anon. lol

Do YOU think fakeness is a problem?

What do you think tech giants are doing with all their AI tech anon? Saving it?

What is going on [here]? Is it a game?

Are our enemies trying to control this board or not?

What opinion can you "shill" for yourself about these questions linguisticallyinnovativeanon?