Think anyone interested in the position (33) has to sacrifice, don't they. I question it everytime I hear of a loss these days. In the book The Devil's Chessboard, Allen Dulles loses a son. The Lindbergh baby, and on and on and on.
Is she yawning?
actually, assuming that and talking yourself out of it with logic and reason is totally sane, acceptable idea.
When you walk into your doctor's office and tell him what's wrong, and he immediately talks himself out of thinking you're going to die in an hour, he isn't a conspiracy theorist; he's doing his job.
bad example for a bad idea:
NO ONE who saw the twat first thought anything other than Broward Co fucked up.
NOT A DAMN thing wrong with throwing ideas out there. NOTHING at all. Worrying about what "others think" has been a feeling exploited by these sick fucks for a long time. I'll pass on that idea. Thanks.
The only thing hyped was that it's from a CIA website, and it IS…it's just they have plausible deniability in that they found it in a compound so title the link as such. OTHERWISE most comprehensive presentation on Payseur so far. You're worried about War Drummer? Kek.
Can they refuse to sell just to expose these sick fucks?
They didn't have enough information to calculate properly. I would argue the assumption wasn't flawed at all based on what was provided and given the motivational nature of this show.
you getting it right doesn't make you more intelligent. it was a 50/50 shot. Broken clock is right twice daily. No offense. Recent admission in vaccine literature…."…we layered assumption upon assumption…"
Now if you knew it was about that guy without knowing he got in trouble…impressive, but still not the best example.
I take from it they're anon, they're patriots, and no one is right all of the time. awful lot of people trying to tell people people are fake people and I wonder how many of those people are fake people.
Of course you could genuinely just care, in which case do you not think we all know to use discernment?
What specific example of harmful error do you have to offer?
more people should read notables.
They don't.
that makes them ADD. Unorganized. Undisciplined. In other words, Autists.
If people knew that and thought it was something else, that's pretty bad, but I typed out a 4 paragraph response to a fake Q post once so….Kek.
First one I saw was the AF1 piece. Had been researching Q for 2 weeks at that point. Decided I didn't care if it was true or not. It was GOOD.
Anyone doubting SB2 work only need ask their pastor about numerology in the bible.
If you listen to Webb, he somehow concludes that they're going to set Flynn up to take the fall for the 19 other guys he's commenting about.
I don't agree with that conclusion, but love his work anyway.
I never get decodes right but always seem to understand the 40k view more than most I interact with. Stretchy eyes is what I tell my daughter she has, like her daddy.
Maybe you'll get this… Why is there no justice equivalent to the cyber investment put forth by intel over the past 10 years?
intel = ABCs
It's what we do: rule out red flags
Assume the worst case scenario and use logical reasoning to sort through the evidence and prove otherwise.
But not everyone working for the government is deep state. Most are starstruck, patriots, or happy with a job that they can't lose easily… that's a big omission. how do you go through the 2010s and not wonder, "hmmmm…. where's our IT department?" or, who made it go away?
Does justice have think tanks like intel does?
No. Even the stratfor files shows these people thought they were working for good causes. They didn't necessarily know they were doing bad things. that wouldn't be possible in your scenario.