Anonymous ID: 8e30fe Dec. 6, 2018, 1:20 p.m. No.4184846   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5037

>>4184802

To call is an "11/11 worldwide seismic event" is an unjustified inference.

We have an 11/11 event that has been detected by seismic stations worldwide.

The source/origin/nature of the event, other than it causes seismographs to bob in a unique way not felt by people on the ground, is unknown. There have been a number of speculations but calling it a "seismic event" begs the question by categorizing the event as seismic which it's not proven to be.

Anonymous ID: 8e30fe Dec. 6, 2018, 1:28 p.m. No.4184980   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5095

>>4184958

Has anybody got a good calendar of upcoming testimony & other events?

I made a list last week but crossed things out so many times it's a mess and I never typed it up b/c kept changing.

Collaborate?

Anonymous ID: 8e30fe Dec. 6, 2018, 1:32 p.m. No.4185023   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5093

>>4185004

WaPo is owned by CIA through shell owner Jeff Bezos. It's not a credible media source. Anything they publish can be assumed to be disinformation, false, spin, fake.

Anonymous ID: 8e30fe Dec. 6, 2018, 1:35 p.m. No.4185067   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4185037

You misunderstood my comment.

I'll rephrase.

Calling it "seismic" implies that the source/cause was earth movement.

Instead, it's more accurate to say it was detected by seismometers but the source/cause is unknown.

Anonymous ID: 8e30fe Dec. 6, 2018, 1:45 p.m. No.4185204   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4185096 If you se someting notable then you should mark it like this

 

On a separate line put 2 equal signs,

the words BAKER NOTABLE then 2 equal signs.

This will generate Baker Notable in red text.

 

Then put the link that you want to make notable followed by a suggested headline