On a recent previous board, I asked if the inaccurate weather reporting for the Los Angeles rain for this morning/today was deliberate. The official forecast was for showers, not this steady moderate to heavy rain which affects the recent burn areas (mudslides, evacuations) and causes havoc on the roads due to accidents/closures. The weather prediction for the west coast is consistently accurate. Not today. Was it deliberate? A distraction? For me, anyway, this recent anon post about the Rothchilds buying up a majority share ownership of US weather forecasting and distribution system, Weather Central answers my question.
This is not proof the FBI was investigating Comet Ping Pong or Pizzagate. It only shows that the letter (from an obvious pizzagate non-believer) was forwarded to the appropriate office.
Showers mean wet weather, possible scattered rain, depending on where you live. Rain in the forecast means rain. In the case of heavy rain, which we had, there was no suggestion of anything as widespread, consistent, heavy or damaging as what we experienced.
Toots is the new Nasim.
Toots is the new bewbs. Hmm, Toots…Tits… Toots=Tits. Yep, chan logic theory confirmation.
Earth shakes, seismograph detects and records it. It's up to the analysts to study the data and determine the cause/source. 17 second wave patterns… hmm…
They have vests, we have the 2nd amendment.
Study of the data from multiple seismic recorders. There would be the usual patterns and source/location, and then unusual. What happened on 11.11 was unusual. If they knew more than that, they would have reported it or hinted in some way. that's all we know.