>>4184441 (lb)
Q is really into the idea of getting things done in the legal way. So not sure that fits.
If that's true, they began a while ago. Anyone else been watching Dutchsinse? AK has been building up for a while. And CA could have a big one very soon, too.
My phone said "cloudy" for all week on Tuesday. But I could tell by looking that it would rain that night. But I don't understand the original complaint. Since when is "showers" not rain? You said they predicted showers? Oh, and one more thing: LA is a state. L.A. is a city/county. Try not to confuse people.
I'd need more than that. Just because she was on the contact list doesn't mean she cooperated.
This event was building up anyway. Maybe the DS takes advantage of natural trends and weaknesses? I've been watching a couple of channels that are relevant. One shows the natural trends, the other appears to show a little "help" on occasion, usually originating in Antarctica.
Is that unusual with large events? I could swear I've seen that happen before. Fukushima, maybe? That deserves a dig…
I wanted to see it for 11 March 2011, but that wasn't available. But if you go into archive.is and search for https://earthquake.usgs.gov/monitoring/operations/heliplot.php?virtual_network=GSN, you'll see others. Not sure what happened on 26 Dec 2016, but the whole planet was ringing then, too.
The scientific establishment WAS trying to blow off Dutchsinse's predictions when he was warning Mayette over the summer. So, yeah, they don't like him. There's nothing that says that the DS won't give a natural trend a little help. They probably do. Do you think that's why NOAA is under confidentiality laws now?