>4185979 (lb)

>Again you are mistaken. The Orthodox churches are an offshoot of the Roman Catholic Church and currently comprise about 10% of all the world's Catholics. Again you will learn in time.

>

>The Protestant and Evangelical Churches are offshoots of the Catholic Church. The Anglicans were created by King Henry VIII (adulterer) and the Lutherans were created by a priest who was a fornicator and suffered from the psychological/spiritual issue of scrupulosity. The Anglicans and Lutherans were the start of all following Christian movements – Evangelical, Calvinist, non-denominational etc.

(((your))) arguments are basically piss poor. so Luther had issues. well, plenty of fuckin popes had more than issues. but it doesnt matter. ad hominem bullshit isnt going to cut it here. and all that it all originated with rome bullshit? its called the genetic fallacy. read up on some of that shit next time. in any case, you are seriously stupid. if you were just ignorant maybe i could learn you some shit. but stupidity of your sort cant be cured….

>>4186217

>Indulgences?

yeah johann tetzel was a real saint. condeming old women to purgatory because they wouldnt starve their families to but fake saints relics in order to fill the pope's coffers. righteous group of fuckers they are.

>>4186326

>The Amazon and Shell execs are very likely to be both cabal infiltrators.

yeah, but so what. Chrysler has to be heavily infiltrated and completely controlled as well. They got bailed out. no way that shit was free. if they werent completely comped prior to the bailout you can bet they were after (my guess is they were cempletely comped by the iacocca period beginning late 70s.

>>4186343

>I am tired of the anti-Catholic BS sprouted by ahistorical individuals.

then you should probably find somewhere else to ply your wares. your views on the history of christianity are just wrong…which makes sense given that it is the roman catholic version that you spout. your love of aquinas while ignoring augustine completely gives it away. but augustine while perhaps less roman is just as catholic as aquinas. and in anticipation of your sudden newfound love of augustine i would note that luther is nothing more than the reintroduction of augustinian ideas into the mainstream of christianity (to the detriment of course of the legacy of aquinas). oh, and while calvin certainly profited from the movement begun by luther, he takes a different line in his interpretation of augustine.

>4186541

>Augustine was a convert, Aquinas was not. The former was more influenced by paganism. The teachings of Christ are the heart of the Roman Catholic Church.

you're not even trying, so no more (you)s for you. please tell your jesuit handlers that you need some retraining complete with physically motivating and preferably painful incentives. the lack of intelligence that emenates from your posts is well above average and is not particularly motivating. last i heard the teachings and traditions of the roman catholic church were at the heart of the roman church.

>>4186614

>Jah is a weak god.

i heard that his bud is pretty good though.