>>4189856

Anon, that's when we found out. He was activated in 2017, at least as early as October, maybe even earlier.

>>4189883

I just said, sometime in October AT LEAST. IIRC, he "resigned" and got re-appointed in August.

>>4189983

I remember that now, though I don't think we've ever gotten a definitive answer from the DoJ itself.

>>4190072

>>4190072

Distraction is the better option. Everybody is CERTAIN he's the pick, based solely on a WaPo article citing "sources." Right. There's a reason for this.

>>4190196

No, but you're too stupid to understand why, so you believe him anyway.