>>419182

this is true. Those who's names are well know were promoted by someone who's name was already known (pulled up the ladder)

>>419422

'Twas a doubtshill asking he question you've answered. They're getting good at integrating themselves

>>419462

that was a shill (ID 18ca7e, post 419422), they have been lurking and (believe that they) know how to sow doubt w/o being spotted

>>419489

I value your opinion, however, posting on POTUS' replies is what Q asked for over a month ago. See >>>/greatawakening/19

>SHOW the WORLD.

>SHOW the WORLD the TRUTH.

>OPEN THEIR EYES.

>DON'T LET POTUS SUFFER FROM THE SOROS/LOSER BOTS THAT CONTINUALLY FLOOD.

>>419657

that trigger was easy to pull :)

No need to point out any suicides at all, I only need to point out that

>Suicide weekend?

ends with a question mark. It is not a definitive statement. A question mark left the statement open. It does not say that "There will definitely be suicides this weekend. Just because anons ran with that the idea that there would be suicides on a particular weekend, doesn't make it so. Hive mind doesn't mean to stop thinking logially for myself, I haven't.

>>419717

see: >>419704