>>419276

I don't see how that's an answer. Explain?

>>419369

Well it's not that hard to explain. For example one can imagine various ways of using formulas (from high school trigonometry) like:

cos(a+b) + cos(a-b) = 2 cos(a) cos(b)

cos(a+b) - cos(a-b) = 2 sin(a) sin(b)

Obviously that's not all there is to designing circuits to use sum and difference frequencies. One has to know about circuit design generally. But those are the sort of relations being used.

>>419282

Allow me to pile on. I've been trying to flesh out the idea of "economic inductance" that he describes as a part of economic modeling. And every link to that phrase goes back to his book. Nobody's written anything in public explaining how that modeling works and how things can be predicted with it. There's plenty of stuff on macroeconomic modeling, but I've never seen anything like "economic inductance" in it.

>>419672

There would have to be an economic explanation of how one models actual economic situations that way. (Then one solves the model using circuit analysis methods.) There doesn't seem to be.

>>419777

Is that all? To explain how to do something that doesn't really seem to fit? Maybe it just doesn't work.

Or maybe it does and the whole thing has been kept successfully under wraps for decades.

>>419806

If they're down with the flu, serrapeptase will reduce mucus so they don't get pneumonia.

>>419825

You're really pushing this hard aren't you? I'll think about it, but just because this one guy with no training in either electronics or economics says this works, I am not going to assume too hard that he's right.

>>419858

I don't need such help.