Anonymous ID: 413dbc Dec. 6, 2018, 8:19 p.m. No.4191403   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4190935 (lb)

>this was (again imo) to protect against the chance that military judges would be reluctant to convict "certain persons" and or check any possible corrupt military judges

So oversight/assistance by someone appointed directly by POTUS?

Interdasting

Anonymous ID: 413dbc Dec. 6, 2018, 8:37 p.m. No.4191685   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1737

>>4191563

So if twatter decides to take down POTUS at some point when things get real spicy, is it in the realm of possibility that they break open the EBS like they did in September as a dry run? Things are getting spoopy..

Anonymous ID: 413dbc Dec. 6, 2018, 8:49 p.m. No.4191906   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4191754

I watched the Rachel Maddow show when the Mike Flynn recommendations came through. They were stumbling and it was glorious. Why did they evil Flynn get a glowing recommendation from the SC with no jail time? Like a robot that does not compute