>>4191362 lb both
so you're not even going to try?
That explains more than enough.
there's really no reason to
it caters to the impatient and would only really work in a vacuum where the only people participating follow the rules of the time intervals
I guess we'll wait and see.
it's cool that they touch on astral and soul memory
don't remember much else about it though. been a while
good job, anon
yeah, the more you talk about this, the more memetic languages and secrecy of the early bibles and the stories that inspired them are relative to what you should be talking about
either I've been very skillfully mislead this entire time or you have little to no knowledge of what you're actually talking about… Maybe there's a third scenario - in which case, enlighten me.
why can't it be so easily explained as Q wanting to remove weak links?
bible linkage
heading reads:
>The TRUTH about the British Monarchy;
the "Golden Jubilee" (50 year reign)
of the queen who never was
you're not understanding it seems
>Sean, we have someone we'd rather insert in to your position. Thank you for your loyalty. Please resign by Monday.
Or was it to be used as a marker?
What happened to Occam's Razor?
sorry anon, we'll have to disagree
It's looking like there's a lot more going on here than any of us will ever really understand.
Ride the spiral, anon.
gchq likes to hang out here too
thanks anon I agree