>>4192036 (lb)
Yeah. You have to be on the Q "team" to receive a Q (you). And if it wasn't for twitter, I'd have abandoned this board long ago. But twitter spreads the Q messages and comments far and wide, and the message is for Trump voters to sit back and relax while Q fixes everything. Well, I have a problem with that.
Enjoy the show, because that's all it is.
Well, that's part of it. But in essence, you were an honorary team member then. There is a pattern of comments, Q replies, replies to Q's replies that indicates an agenda. Exactly what, I'm not completely sure, but there is a pattern and Q is not as gregarious and sociable with the plebs as we'd like to think, in my opinion.
You don't have to be a regular but if it's written in a way that is influential and desirable, you might get a you
Q yous are not a merit based algorithm. I'm a lawfag and I've seen you's given that were juvenile in that area while intelligent related comments were ignored by both Q and those who tend to post using words typed in red, capital letters
Congratulations, patriot.
Objectively, when has Q been right?
Have to quell the anti-Q sentiment that arises from an observable, unique source and might influence others
Define projection
Exactly
Like I said, those twitter accountswho spread disinfo originating here. It seems logical to influence the source than battle the many streams flowing from it. Plus I'm on /pol/ anyway much of the time and I enjoy debating, sharing info, etc.
But the thing is, your post justified delay. Which is what most non-Q team (you) posts do. They justify non-habbenings.
Q wants your red headed beauty's kids to have brown skin, eyes, and hair.
"Patriots have no skin color." -Q
You missed the point