>>4198053 (lb)
but for that one flaw/oversight, the whole thing fits like magic. I'm perplexed (and bummed)… Definitely don't mind the criticism though… esp. pointing out a factual error on my part.
I don't have the answer…
maybe ask NoName?
or if he's not available—ask Poppy Bush?
those guys have the answer to your question, no doubt.
i agree, anon—on purpose makes more sense to me.
-1- baits Hilldawg and her allies into attacking Trump. Trump promptly invites Bill Clinton's rape victims to the debate? let you grab 'em vs. rape? easy calculation.
-2- stress test to see who was truly loyal.