https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/420131-feds-received-whistleblower-evidence-in-2017-alleging-clinton-foundation
I read carefully, and this is what stuck out to me.
>“When you have the organization’s own lawyers using words like ‘quid pro quo,’ ‘conflicts of interest’ and ‘whistleblower
>protections,’ you have enough to get permission to start interviewing and asking questions,” he said.
>Danik said the only investigative challenge is that some documents assembled by the private investigators are marked as
>attorney-client privileged and federal agents might need special permission to use them.
>“Given that [special counsel Robert] Mueller got the OK to investigate Michael Cohen and his attorney-client communications
>with President Trump, I imagine that hurdle could be overcome under the crime-fraud exception,” he said.
Now we know Cohen's purpose in all of this.