>>4205171

ok, tell me more. i used to agree, and still may. are you REALLY saying we were not supposed to infer a connection? all i saw was no apostle's creed at the funeral, and 3 envelopes. nothing 'concrete', to coin a term. i am still trying to tie what happened Wednesday with the chess match, but as usual, i do not have enough to go on. and i am tired of mashing jigsaw puzzle pieces together when they are from different puzzles, and we are not told they are from different puzzles until we waste a bunch of time chasing our asses down a rabbit hole…

or…

do you just msm the q drops away that don't fit your narrative?

>>4205171

>D5 isn't a date

>>4205649

>>4205662

>>4205662

you can write, did i wrongly assume you can read?

>>4205713

is that an answer? i don't see how you are backing up your statement, that

D5 … [D]ecember 5

is not a date.

p.s. - i am not the one that is acting triggered, at least not by the nonanon i am conversing with. i am used to the stupid here lately. i miss /pol/. do you even know what /pol/ is, newfag? kek.

i am upset at the amount of Next Weeks, 11:11's, and so many other non-happenings foretold occur.

and plz, this time actually read the whole drop. if you can.

>>4205649