Example of a helpful post regarding tweets, whitewater, OKC. Extremely helpful when connections are posted, and some background instead of the Anon posts last bread, screeching "but trump tweeted this you dumb asshole"
Curse at me, IDC, but at least point out how you've come to your opinion.
I see what you're laying down. Thank you Anon! (DamAnon will drop the damn dams now)
I was skeptical tbh, but figured if all else fails, Q stands for Questions. This all reminded us to Question EVERYTHING. Win/Win
We become an ARMY when we unite, the People Army.
>>420908
No, I don't think any of us humans are infallible Anon. My point was actually made clear. We've learned to stand on our own and question events, research them, and blast them.
I'm never going to fully trust in anyone unless it's proven. Even then I'm watching for a fuck up, and will call it. Believe that.
I'm going to guess Dams are jacked, no matter who says otherwise, our infrastructure is crumbling. Dams can be sabotaged like railways.
Filter Pelicanfag and I can keep up with bread. If someone's posting 38 times in bread, they're disrespecting the poor Baker who's trying to keep up.
Arguing just makes me believe people less, you don't have to argue but one or two posts at most if you're comfortable in your opinion. Pelicanfag was mad that I even wanted to expand my thinking to think about people sabotaging the Dams. Almonds Activated. 2-AUER is up to something.
Agreed. I'm not acknowledging anyone being really rude to Anons, for that matter. Poor Baker :(
Thing is, I know better. I'm not even surly today, just surly with people protecting the enemy like that. Sunday dinner. God Bless ya Anon.