Anonymous ID: 6c7bfa Feb. 18, 2018, 2 p.m. No.420738   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0748 >>0785

>>420696

And anyone can still type up something anonymously, ascribe it to anyone, upload it somewhere and gullible people will get all aflutter and believe it.

 

What happened to some semblance of critical thinking and standards?

 

Just because something is written in a way that "sounds good" or "feels right" to us or confirms what we think we know does not make it real.

 

Think people. Use some judgment, read, think, file it away, if there is actual confirmation, great, if not, oh well, can't use that as any kind of proof because there is no proof.

Anonymous ID: 6c7bfa Feb. 18, 2018, 2:13 p.m. No.420886   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>420872

Think what he's saying is that those programs were so successful they could be shut down, and those practices just incorporated to become the SOP.

>>420747 can correct if that is not right.

Anonymous ID: 6c7bfa Feb. 18, 2018, 2:18 p.m. No.420928   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>420889

Manafort situation reminds me of Carter Page a lot:

>intel sends operative to go incriminate a shady foreigner

>in order to do that operative has to do shady shit

>operative does shady shit

>then the operative becomes the focus instead of the shady foreigners

Who is playing whom?