So black hat comms have been shut down. How do these traitor spyfags communicate with their Chinese overlords while trying to avoid white hat comm collection? National Propaganda Radio.

NPR awkwardly forced code word 'concrete' into their shitty Morning Edition propaganda show several times Thursday

While hate listening on the way to work I heard 'concrete' one time and didn't think anything of it. Then within 2 minutes that smug feckless cunt Rachel Martin dropped another 'concrete' and I'm like "twice?". I had to go back and listen to this shit again since I wasn't really paying attention. Turns out they're discussing the arrest of the Huawei executive with this clown William Zarit who heads the chamber of commerce in Beijing. Because now there's 2 concrete drops, I force myself to listen to the entire Morning Edition, all of the segments, and that's not easy because that shit is annoying. Eventually after a few segments there's a third 'concrete' drop. Fag David greene is doing a story on "muh climate change" because they're ALWAYS doinng a story about 'muh climate change'. The segment is completely lame but the subject is "MANAGED RETREAT" (intersting topic if you're thiking codes) from rising sea levels and the homeowners in Del Mar California need a 'concrete' wall to separate the homes from the sea. “Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action”

Whether she's code talking to clowns in China or not, Rachel Martin shows signs of being mockingird media. There are some odd gaps in her career timeline. As a "freelancer" during graduate school at Columbia she just "packed her bags and went to Afghanistan" to cover the war for a few weeks, because non clowns just do that all the time. When asked how she arranged the trip Rachel says she just called up a woman who she only met once and the two "traveled the war zone together" and "at the hotel she 'met a man' who got her names numbers and stories. Rachel "got a driver, translator and formed her own team. Then went back to Afghanistan after graduating to cover the presidential election", as you do.

Now I wasn't totally convinced and was about to write off Rachel's career weirdness as coincidence. Then you follow the wives. Or look at her husband. Luke Hartig, heavily involved in the Obama administrtion's national security council, senior director counter terrorism. "peace corps" in guatemala "developing water and sanitation systems for rural villages". Coincidentally, he also just happened to work for the state department and the bureau of international narcotics and law enforcement affairs. Surely earned experience for that job in Guatemala. Travelled with the Secretary of Defense like Rachel did. Council on Foreign Relations of course. As well as ties to Soros via New America formerly New America Foundation

>>4209974

So if you're still reading, you're going to need some background. Read the transcript or even better listen to the audio of this "On the Media" story where

NPR "pulls back the curatin"

and tells their audience how they make their fake news. They totally explain to their audience how they stealth edit audio and add fake ambient sound to make their stupid Morning Edition and other propanda shows sound like live interview shows. It's really quite (((clever))) how they cloak their disclosure in an entertainment style this is how the sausage gets made 10 minute segment. That way they can point back 14 years ago to that buried, memory holed segment (note the transcript link is archive.org) if they have to when someone questions them on interview show slice and dice propaganda edits. Different John Solomon by the way.

Pulling Back the Curtain

December 31, 20

JOHN SOLOMON: Before I started working at On the Media, I was an avid NPR News listener. To me, like many devotees, an important aspect of the network's appeal is how smooth, well-crafted and polished it sounds. Everyone seems so eloquent. Interviewers ready with a clearly-posed, on-point question. Interviewees offering an articulate answer. Rarely an "uh, um," or "you know" uttered. Correspondents in the field, even when reporting from the middle of the rain forest, are equally cogent and coherent, and hosts move naturally, effortlessly and spontaneously between stories. That soothing and reliable sound has made the NPR [ALL THINGS CONSIDERED THEME UP AND UNDER] product distinctive from other radio and news media. [SFX: NPR NEWS SOUNDING SMOOTH]

DAVID CARR: Everybody always sounds erudite and witty on NPR, and I've always wondered why, and I think there probably is some darkroom magic going on there.

JOHN SOLOMON: My exposure to the darkroom began when I edited my first story. I sat at the digital editing console with a producer, listening to an interview with a source I had recorded earlier. With just strokes of the keyboard, he cleaned up and tightened the sound bites I was going to use, taking out sentences, words and even some of the pauses, making what are called "internal edits." Then the various thoughts were woven together technically in a way that would be totally hidden to the listener. In fact, the public is far less aware of editing on radio than on television or in print. For example, to eliminate words, a TV producer has to use more visible means, such as a cutaway shot or jump cut. Newspaper reporters by form must put a break between non-consecutive quotations, among other constraints. David Carr says that at the Times:

DAVID CARR: "People have to speak in complete sentences or…you don't use it."

JOHN SOLOMON: NPR interview subjects almost never complain about the slicing and dicing, in large part because the edits make them sound more articulate without changing the meaning. In fact, what David Carr actually said on tape was:

DAVID CARR: "People have to speak in complete sentences or you, you, you, you don't, you don't use it."

JOHN SOLOMON: [LAUGHS] Here, at On the Media, we do even more editing because as a weekly show, we have more time. It helps make us sound far more articulate than we actually are. For example, here's Bob's original question in a recent interview taping with National Journal's Bill Powers. [SFX: BOB ASKING QUESTION BEFORE EDIT]

BOB GARFIELD: Now your column this week says that it -there's a - actually a disadvantage to being a frontrunner because immediately the media want to take you down. That is a very serious charge, really, against the media. How true is it? Is - are those - are the motives really so– let's see– [WHISPERING] are the motives really so– sinister – that's not quite the right word – are they really so–all right– [LAUGHS].

BILL POWERS: You might say are they probably so vicious? Or–?

BOB GARFIELD: Mindlessly blood–bloodthirsty. I mean what you're describing is a kind of blood lust. Are the media really bloodthirsty? Isn't there, isn't there something a little bit more responsible going on?

JOHN SOLOMON: Here's how it sounded after the editing. [SFX: BOB'S QUESTION AFTER THE EDIT]

BOB GARFIELD: Now your column this week says there's a -actually a disadvantage to being a frontrunner because immediately the media want to take you down. I mean what you're describing is a kind of blood lust. Are the media really bloodthirsty? Isn't there something a little bit more responsible going on?

transcript

https://web.archive.org/web/20101001015025/http://www.onthemedia.org:80/yore/transcripts/transcripts_123104_curtain.html

audio

https://www.wnyc.org/story/129437-pulling-back-the-curtain/

>>4209985

Now lets look a bit closer at the concrete interview. Note how many umms, stutters, and other audio weirdness there is in this interview by both the guest and the host when we now know they usually edit that out. All things that the stealth editing could easily edit out to make Rachel and the guest sound "more erudite and eloquent" and they left it in, why? Then think about the topic and listen closely to how the guest answers the questions. You'll note some odd phrases in the answers like "keep the powder dry" and tempo changes like "do what they need to do perhaps do just enough to keep the us admin at bay". See pic related for some notes on the weirdness in the interview. Then think about the "managed retreat" story on David Greene's concrete drop.

Then lets look at the guest. Clown William Zarit.

Until May 2014 Mr. Zarit was Minister for Commercial Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, overseeing the U.S. Department of Commerce’s trade and investment promotion and trade policy activities in its operations in Beijing, Chengdu, Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenyang. He achieved the Career Minister rank for his work.

Prior to his posting to Beijing, Mr. Zarit was Deputy Assistant Secretary, International Operations, for the U.S. Commercial Service, overseeing Commercial Sections in U.S. Embassies and Consulates worldwide. Prior to that Mr. Zarit served as the U.S. Commercial Service’s Regional Director for East Asia/Pacific. He previously served as Senior Commercial Officer (SCO) at the U.S. Embassy in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and Deputy SCO at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing as well as the American Institute in Taiwan.

I could keep digging on this guy but do I need to? Just look at him

>>4209997

===

Bonus post for anyone still with me. In some stupid 'what the clowns want you to read' segment, Fag David Green forces a completely ridiculous pedo Tom Hanks reference when his guest talks about a book about trees. The book the guest is talking about is about trees and sounds totally boring but somehow the guest's tree book triggers Dave to think of Pedo Tom Hanks' typewriter book. Makes complete sense right? nah.

Defund NPR

>>4209997

pic related notes of the concrete interview

>>4209985

Concrete interview: https://www.npr.org/2018/12/06/674036722/a-resolution-to-the-u-s-china-trade-war-is-not-in-the-offing

Tom Hanks Reference: https://www.npr.org/2018/12/06/673698311/lynn-nearys-reading-recommendations-for-the-book-lovers-on-your-list

Concrete Muh Climate Change: https://www.npr.org/2018/12/04/672285546/retreat-is-not-an-option-as-a-california-beach-town-plans-for-rising-seas

>>4210218

>But, of course, what Trump meant was “scot-free,” a centuries-old phrase meaning to escape punishment, which has nothing to do with a person named Scott.

But, of course Meagan Flynn has no idea what POTUS meant because she didn't ask the Q.

=Ask the Q Meagan=