Anonymous ID: c5757e Dec. 8, 2018, 6:18 p.m. No.4220660   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4220641

it's just clockfags fapping to clockfaggotry

>the origins of the clockfagclock

an anon made it up using faulty logic with no foresight

but I better stop or I'll get labeled a shill

Anonymous ID: c5757e Dec. 8, 2018, 6:35 p.m. No.4220855   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0913

>>4220840

>Not all bakers require or vet sauce, some just go on nominations

>this doc hasn't been in notables

doing well so far, most stand alone docs without sauce don't make it

when the sauce is known to anons or posted with the doc, then it sometimes goes in if it's deemed notable by anons with the baker's 'ok'

Anonymous ID: c5757e Dec. 8, 2018, 6:44 p.m. No.4220981   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1108

>>4220913

i have never been told the meaning of any clockfag graphic

I don't take it seriously, at all

but, I'll continue to put it in notables because some anons like it, and clockfags would kvetch and whine about muh comped baker

can never get an answer from them, and when I or another anon raises questions, they get called a shill

but you're right, some of the graphics are laughably fake and gay as fuck, even clockfags will call some out as such

>Wish this were true, but it varies widely by baker.

as for that, I don't and not many bakers do

but that's just from my own personal experience