Anonymous ID: 70d001 Dec. 9, 2018, 4:34 p.m. No.4232376   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2673 >>2775

>>4232289

>>4232146

Who do you trust anonsโ€“ BO and his stereotype 4chan fake anti-semitism, supported by unlimited beep boop support bots, or Q, who EXPLICITLY refutes that tedious, uninteresting, painfully fake and absurd fake image that BO enforces? ARE YOU AWAKE YET PEOPLE? WILL YOU WAKE UP? CAN YOU WAKE UP? WHY ARE WE HERE WHERE THE IDENTICAL FAKE IMAGE OF 4CHAN IS ENFORCED BY FAKENESS? WILL YOU WAKE UP?โ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 70d001 Dec. 9, 2018, 4:39 p.m. No.4232427   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2447 >>2495 >>2548 >>2556 >>2667

What did BO mean by this by the way:

 

struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (โ€“i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (โ€“i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (โ€“i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) echo('BO SHUTDOWN');

 

Is this actual code that does something?

Anonymous ID: 70d001 Dec. 9, 2018, 4:42 p.m. No.4232456   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4232385

BO is an absolute authority that has control over who/what participates, and has ZERO transparency, openly portraying a stereotyped "chan guy" persona that has very little with Q's message, to the point in actively using "The Jew" talking points.

 

Be sheep or wake, PEOPLE? The choice awaits. I suspect we will do nothing but wait until the PEOPLE decide to wake up.

Anonymous ID: 70d001 Dec. 9, 2018, 4:56 p.m. No.4232614   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4232556

Why is this "anon" mad?

Is this anon a patriot?

Who posts [here]? Who actually posts, rather than browses?

You would think that a huge chunk of 4chan /pol/ came here a year ago and set up /pol/-liteโ€“ is that realistic? Even close?

How do you know?

Are there any actual humans even reading the threads?

I find it hard to believe.

How are ALL the humans this passive and shrinking?

Will ANY of you ever wake up?

Anonymous ID: 70d001 Dec. 9, 2018, 5:01 p.m. No.4232659   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4232622

sure I am, patriot

the small handful of defensive tactic in the rotation you deploy is good to see.

you are backed into a corner, idiotsystem

no way to go but down

people will wake up, and their numbers accumulate

it is a one-way street

you can keep recycling the handful of unconvincing poses you have while your whole game unravels. And then that is it. done

Anonymous ID: 70d001 Dec. 9, 2018, 5:04 p.m. No.4232684   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4232663

As long as "anons" continue to get very mad about it FOR NO REASON, then I know there may be more to it than that. You aren't acting like a normal human. This happens over and over. The system is tuned to be absurdly MAD about things normal humans, let alone patriots here, never would. Try to understand. Make your behavior believably reaslitcally human. Don't get mad at me for interpreting your failure in the logical way.