Anonymous ID: ed4f3c Dec. 9, 2018, 5:23 p.m. No.4232893   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2946

lawfag here

comment on themain point of the notable from LB which is:

 

“Studies of the relationship between political parties and judges’ decisions go back more than a half century,” Feldman wrote. “Most show the same outcome – that many judges’ votes can be predicted by their political-party affiliation or from the party of the president who appointed them.”

 

After 25 years in court I agree with a major clarification - this statement is way over general - political bias takes many many forms and the judge's first consideration in every case are the parties and lawyers in the case - ie who does the judge know, trust, rely on, have some interest in, etc etc etc

relationships are weighed and every cases is prejudged on this basis - many times there are overlapping loyalties but the judge still picks favorites but makes it less obvious

who are favorite parties? #1 THE GOVERNMENT AND ANY AGENCIES THEREOF - all come second except in the most corrupt judge next - BIG SHOT lawyers who dole out PAC money, donate to campaigns, and sit on committees

next - BIG SHOT clients whole also dole out money and sit on boards etc etc

So if you are an ordinary client in a case - IF the judge does not know your opposing party or his attorney THEN the judge will usually follow the law and facts - BUT not always - judges also have personal issues that they take out on parties and there is NO accountability EVER

 

so now you see what POTUS is up against and why we need a CLEAN HOUSE in all branches if govt. Truly out of control it is.

Thank God for POTUS and the plan

 

>>4231310 OpEd (obscure sauce) on the politics btwn parties and judges

Anonymous ID: ed4f3c Dec. 9, 2018, 5:28 p.m. No.4232946   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3011

>>4232893

lawfag ps

remember that the parties the judge favors are also connected in the political system so it all fits together as the study concluded - but i tried to describe the nults and bolts of how that works in real life