>>423438

I have another theory about it. Those brackets are part of the formatting language on this site.

Q, was the double bracket intentional or was it put there in an effort to overcome the formatting features?

>>>/greatawakening/104

And now we have

>>>/greatawakening/105

as well.

>>423739

Depends on context. Snowden is on Q's shit list lately, in case you haven't noticed.

>>423762

Kinda difficult to complain about them when Q is one of them. hehehe

>>423784

105 is still there. 106 was deleted.

>>423824

Never mind. 105 is gone now, too.

>>423843

Grab it if you still have it.

>>423863

I got that one in my last archive. I saw 106 in another Anon's screen shot. I'm not going to sweat it if I'm missing that one. It appears to be more administrative.

>>423939

Yes, I have it. But I'm in the process of putting posts into my database. I suspect another Anon can get it to you faster.

>>423989

Oops! No, I missed 106. But someone posted an image of it. It's a confirmation post, not a digging post.

>>423957

>>424064

From >>>/greatawakening/108

"CLEAN ACTION APPROVED."

Gotta believe that's more of a justice action. Arrest, maybe?

>>424104

Wow. Not even that one is there anymore. Good thing I have everything archived.

>>424266

Remember, archive.is and saving from the browser only save the thumbnails. If there's a more complex pic you want, you need to save that separately.

Is the new greatawakening thread supposed to be postable by Anons like that?