>>4238794 (pb)
>"LEGALITY".
If you plan on turning this into a pasta, a suggested edit to better get the point across as to why things have to be done methodically and by the book:
→ (((They))) hide behind & within a [Facade] of "LEGALITY" "LEGALISM"
reason: legalism is the color of law. Think of it this way:
Real (life) =/= realistic (movie)
Legal (actual law) =/= legalistic (color of law)
SO:
-
You turn the tables on (((them))).
→ Bring the Law to bear against the color of law that [they] love.
Other than that I have no further rebuttal.
———
Valid points. Well taken anon.
Was already preparing an addendum to my post upon reflection.
——
Since (((they))) are children of their [father] the Devil, per Jesus, (((they))) love LEGALISM → a weaponized [facade] of propriety.