Now ask yourselves, why the FUCK would he ever choose to bring this back into the news cycle?
Now ask yourselves, why the FUCK would he ever choose to bring this back into the news cycle?
Nice catch, I was just looking for [C]s this morning and was staring right at that post.
Never realized there was a past typo to compare for the Delta.
The problem is, we keep finding these downstream "proofs" but as far as we are concerned they are disconnected and sort of random.
What is this actually telling us?
We need to make the last push and figure out what these little glimpses into the MAP methodology actually lead to.
Instead of just clapping like retards every time we find one and just putting on the shelf with the others.
>They would be better off ignoring it.
Not if they are pretty certain it's going to be going public in the near future.
Then their best strategy would be to spin as hard as they can before it does.