Anonymous ID: a2c9c2 Dec. 10, 2018, 8 a.m. No.4239897   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4239801

 

Nice catch, I was just looking for [C]s this morning and was staring right at that post.

Never realized there was a past typo to compare for the Delta.

Anonymous ID: a2c9c2 Dec. 10, 2018, 8:03 a.m. No.4239923   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9932 >>0399

>>4239887

 

The problem is, we keep finding these downstream "proofs" but as far as we are concerned they are disconnected and sort of random.

 

What is this actually telling us?

We need to make the last push and figure out what these little glimpses into the MAP methodology actually lead to.

Instead of just clapping like retards every time we find one and just putting on the shelf with the others.

Anonymous ID: a2c9c2 Dec. 10, 2018, 8:14 a.m. No.4240010   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4239982

 

>They would be better off ignoring it.

Not if they are pretty certain it's going to be going public in the near future.

Then their best strategy would be to spin as hard as they can before it does.