Anonymous ID: affecf Dec. 10, 2018, 8:19 a.m. No.4240065   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0117

>>4239798

Neo-feudalistic with a socialist/communist twist. It's neo-feudalistic in the sense of having basically two classes, the elite, and then everyone else. It's socialistic/communistic in the sense that, in the world, you have some countries on the bottom, some countries at the top and then everything in between. What they want to do is to, "level," the playing field on a global scale. In other words, take from the rich countries and give to the poor countries. They want to bring the lower countries up and knock the higher countries down to some arbitrary median. It's socialism/communism on a national scale instead of an individual scale.

Anonymous ID: affecf Dec. 10, 2018, 8:31 a.m. No.4240191   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4240151

Now remember how private citizens are not supposed to represent or make policy decisions for our country. I guess by saying, "off the record," that somehow gets them off the hook?

Anonymous ID: affecf Dec. 10, 2018, 8:35 a.m. No.4240246   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0306

>>4240151

If you read those meeting minutes, you can get a glimpse of what they are up to. It's a tiered system of international banking designed to equalize things so to speak.

Anonymous ID: affecf Dec. 10, 2018, 8:41 a.m. No.4240306   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4240246

Let's say you're a third world country. You want a loan. So, tier one, you have a loan limit of say 100 million dollars. You are required to spend it on basic infrastructure, roads, water etc. If you pay it back you then are allowed on to tier 2.

 

BUT…they are bankers, they want collateral, guarantees. Some countries have natural resources like gold or whatever, but some have not much of anything. What to do? I suspect that at that point your people become a commodity for collateral.

 

If the country has resources but defaults, guess who now owns the resources and probably the country as well.