The SC is declining to hear the case because PP will be prosecuted.
If the SC picked up the case that would == double jeopardy, which the constitution forbids.
This is why the shills are sperging about muh PP case
It's partially about jurisdiction, but to answer your question:
In layman's terms, what it means is that if there is PP litigation in process for that aspect in the complaint brought to the SC for consideration, and the SC takes the case, whatever was in process for the previous case gets scrapped and you start again, because you cannot prosecute the same crime twice in different courts.
Which means discovery starts all over again.
And [they] will do anything to derail the dire straits PP is in right now.
>think about what you just typed…
Take your own advice.
Irrelevant. States have supreme courts.
PP will pay a far higher price with the case on it's current track in the respective states.
Going straight to USSC serves [them].
I personally look at "channelling" and "mind control" as functionally the same thing:
Something other than your own sentience controlling your body.
Your brain and mouth being part of the body.
I'm done too.
I whole point is this, though I know I did not openly state it:
There is something bigger than medicaid payments coming down the pipe for PP.
Like Human Trafficking.
Why squabble at the state level, and get involved in a states rights issue, when the big fish is still out there?
I like the idea of getting them for trafficking instead of the pissant medicaid shit.
>sure. if you really think about mind control you have to accept that it is an incredibly loose term … channeling is a whole different story. and then you get into possession.
It is what it is; I'm still going to maintain that all of them are the control of a human from outside of the given human. Whether it be channelling, possession, or mkultra esotericism .
And the higher functions/mind is the vector.
In most cases the corruption is only in the top echelons, and anything below upper management has limited knowledge, if any at all.
Thats what I was trying to get at:
If scotus takes a PP case, anything under wraps would not be anymore.