>>4241291 (lb)
>The Trump administration is currently formulating a new federal regulation called the Protect Life Rule which would forbid public funding of Planned Parenthood under Title X.
Which is why SCOTUS won't be hearing the defective state-only approach.
Come on anons. Thinky thinky.
SMOCKING: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=smocking
Time to redpill, anons.
Has there been a full decode of that cover yet?
I've seen several partial attempts.
Needs a PEPEfied version, dontcha think?
Know the talent exists here. Maybe someone will consider it.
I know anons make fun of this, but the older I get, the more comfortable that outfit looks.
Pajamas for day and night.
Down with that idea. :)
Whoa. That just clicked.
How do you present evidence legally?
I'd say, in this case, by investigating a "break in."
Why decode the cover?
>>4241386 (me - won't let me post it again)
Because (((they))) are required to signal/tell their plans for attack in order to make it "fair" before the kill.
That's why.
You aren't exactly aware of what's planned for the House of Representatives, are you?
Oh, geez. That video - "I am your father." Anyone keep it?
Thanks for your confidence anon, but it was repurposed work from a couple of breads ago. Another anon made the catch. I just pitched it again.
Screen cap it? I don't see it there.
Any clean image of her from 2006? That seems to be a year that comes up over and over again.
I'm awake POTUS. You clever rascal, you.
Got it
Gotta be real for a couple of hours.
Will work on 2019 Economist decode when anon returns.
Thanq anon! This reversal was going to be my first step.
Yep. You must have missed it completely.