TY Baker!!!
>>4241298 (lb)
What is he even trying to accomplish with this statement? That we shouldn't call our heroes heroes because they wouldn't call themselves that? I seriously don't understand this.
Well, it's more complicated than that. Lots of intelligent people fell for the surface level shit. There is a group of Satanists using it all as a shield, though. It's complicated as fuck all, but there's a "there", there, nonetheless. We had a great discussion on Hitler a couple of breads ago. It kind of helps shed light on it.
>>4239730 (pb)
Good discussions had. It gets more clear at this plan moves forward, and other high IQ anons start chiming in. Lord knows we've all been used as a conduit (unknowingly) from time to time. Hang in there, anon.
I mean, it's beyond stupidity!
>and claims QAnon is the source of pizzagate
Q is the source for more than just that. How do you think we all ended up here? When, exactly, do you think this operation started? Sit back and think about it seriously for a moment.
What if Q actually predates Q by a year? 5 years? 10 years? How would a realization of that affect your perception of what's going on here?
Sure, that's one way of looking at it. I don't watch CNN, but that reporter didn't appear to be hostile towards Mucc in the least. He was bringing up a "He said, She said" scenario, likely one that Mucc setup on his own to begin with, and gave Mucci the chance to "explain" it. that gave Qanon plenty of air time. On CNN. Conflating pizzgate with it, to me, is a way of saying "Well, that whole pizza thing might be something valid, in light of this Q phenomenon.