>>4247035

Structure change coming?

People always assume the most radical and disruptive change is about to happen. But I do not think that is the plan. I did some googling with

federal reserve structural change

And I learned that first of all, the people who talk about the Federal Reserve also talk about structure and its change in more than one context. And then I came across this paper

https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/feddgw/333.html

And just reading the abstract I learned something which I highlighted in BOLD

Services, which are less traded than goods, rose from 58 percent of world expenditure in 1970 to 79 percent in 2015. In a trade model featuring nonhomothetic preferences and input-output linkages, we find that such structural change has restrained the growth in world trade to GDP by 16 percentage points over this period. This magnitude is similar to how much declining trade costs have boosted openness. Moreover, structural change dampens the measured gains from trade by incorporating endogenous responses of expenditure shares to the trade regime. Ongoing structural change implies declining openness, even absent rising protectionism.

So, there is structure change CAUSED by less manufacturing and more services in the economy. This REDUCES openness in and of itself. Trump's MAGA includes much GROWTH in manufacturing which is ALREADY STRUCTURE CHANGE and is already having and impact.

I think this is part of what Q referred to, STRUCTURE CHANGE in the economy caused by the programs coming soon to rebuild America's infrastructure which will lead to a FURTHER BOOM in manufacturing.

I expect that another part of the structure change is to change the way that the Fed collects and analyzes numbers and uses those number to justify interest rates. Remember that the Trump administration now controls the board of the Fed. Even while it is still a privately owned bank, it is being reined in.

I have no doubt that there is some more radical structure change planned, but that will come closer to 2024 when the PEOPLE will take ownership of the Fed so that interest accrued by the Fed can be offset against taxes.

Trump has already shown that he is NOT in favor of disruptive changes that might harm the people or weaken the USA. If this means we need 10 steps to get to a change in beneficial ownership, then Trump will take that long and winding path, nudging the old nag in the right direction at the right time.

If you want to keep up with Trump, you need to keep up with your education, not just follow some miracle workers who have a guaranteed better plan.

>>4247230

BAKER NOTABLE

>>4247268

How can Gold store value when it is so easy to manufacture?

They may have taken the main factory offline for two years, but there are other ones. And it turns out that you need to make less gold than was thought. If you start with tungsten bars, you only have to convert the surfaces into gold and nobody will dig into the bars and realize that the cores are tungsten.

Gold is not a wise store of value to base a currency on. It has its uses, but the sole store of the value in money is not one of them.

Fiat money can work, if the people collectively as the government, own and control the whole fiat chain. Private central banks are the main evil that breaks this.

>>4247239

Trips to Antarctica are cover for the real destination.

To get to Antarctica, you have to travel to New Zealand or Argentina, FIRST.

Those places are where the Cabal has been building their underground bunkers to survive the nuclear war and asteroid impacts in the northern hemisphere.

Never forget, their plan including KILLING 7.5 billion of us.