————————————————-
Question to lawfag.
————————————————-
Is there a U.S. statute under which someone could be charged for "crimes against humanity"? Because that's what Q mentioned in relation to Samantha Powers. I assume some of the others have done even worse. So will many be charged with "crimes against humanity" or is that just a term of art describing a horrific crime that will be charged under some other statute(s)?
>>4246023 (lb) "Retooling" the Fed won't make any difference to citizens if that body remains owned by blood sucking parasites who needlessly receive a massive, seemingly eternal flow of wealth off the work of the people, just by electronically "printing" what is called money. Capitalist here, but the Fed system isn't really capitalism—it is indentured servitude for everyone but the leeches.
Am hoping that at least some of the shares of the "families" can be confiscated via EO if investigations prove they have been doing naughty things. In a just world, they lose everything.
>>4246834 Prior comments not by me. Further, just what is your point? I see you do not dispute my statements.