>>4249031

Baker, please reconsider listening to anons and removing the slide notable:

>>4248248, >>4248427, >>4248922 Video: POTUS & Bush look at each other before SS agent slips Bush papers at 41's funeral (speculation)

All from lb:

>>4248964

>Chill nigga we had enough disrespect towards our Bakers lately

The solution to this problem is not to relax our standards to the point of making fools of ourselves by noting nonsense

Many anons pointed out the notable was a fake & gay slide. It's a baker's responsibility to exercise discernment in this area and accept feedback from experienced anons to bolster it or, when needed, to check it. Yes, shills also attack bakers but they do so on false grounds, and their identity as shills can be confirmed by tracking ID's or, sometimes, by BO/BV straight coming on with hash history. If baker can't tell the difference btwn shill and anon feedback, baker shouldn't bake.

>>4248275

>not this shit again….

>>4248937

>Not notable

>Come on baker

>>4249021

>Baker NOT Notable

>No fucking eye contact!

>GTFO with this fucking slide!

>>4249021

>Seconded. Not notable. We went over this the day of the ceremony.

>>4249016

>ffs baker, it's been a slide for a week now

>>4249010

>BAKING SO STFU WITH YOUR COMPLAINTS

This isn't how it works, baker. Either complaints are legit, and you are responsive to them, or they're not, and anons and BO/BV back you up against shills. But if you ignore legit complaints, anons will not stay silent.

Ty for your efforts

>>4249323

>how the hell am i supposed to know who's a shill and who's not?

Discernment, as I said in my prev. post.

>if you're a baker you can take the handoff now.

If you want to handoff next bread, call out. Another baker will accept if around. Always bakers lurking. BO/BV will vet if shills offer.

>>4249277

re:

>>4249170 are you.. actually a baker..?

Again, discernment.

>>4249392

>LOTS OF ANONS liking the notable nature of the spoopy activities the day of this shite

We're not reddit or facebook, this isn't a democracy. We don't "like" things into a state of objective truth simply by vote count. We're a meitocracy with objective standards. Not all opinions are equal.

>>4249534

> i'm gonna take the 10 positive posts about my baking and ignore the 1 needlessly negative one.

a) we're not a democracy, vote count is irrelevant

b) there are at least 4 or 5 different anons that requested the slide not be noted

c) not needlessly negative. trying to uphold objective standards. not all criticism is negative for the sake of being negative. sometimes it's given for the sake of preventing greater harm