>>4249781

>>4249534 lb

> i'm gonna take the 10 positive posts about my baking and ignore the 1 needlessly negative one.

a) we're not a democracy, vote count is irrelevant

b) there are at least 4 or 5 different anons that requested the slide not be noted

c) not needlessly negative. trying to uphold objective standards. not all criticism is negative for the sake of being negative. sometimes it's given for the sake of preventing greater harm

>>4249624 lb

>shoving his agenda to his bakes, the whole "muhcompd baker" fiasco would have been greatly weakened.

>c5a539

The above "anon" also posted these (lb):

>>4249707, >>4249346, >>4249468, >>4249492

'grats baker, you've got the seal of approval from known (((JIDF shills)))

>>4249349 lb

>complains about work they do not do.

This anon does a good deal of work for QR and for my country. I protect what I have a stake in, what I love. But my comments stand on their own merit. Claims are either objectively true and relevant or they're not. That's what being "anon" means.

>>4249893

>>4249886

>>4249836

Agreed, these are not notable:

>>4249648 Possible Q proof?

>>4249083 Anon compilation of discussion on South Pole/Admiral Byrd spanning 2 breads - inspired by Q post today (slide? u decide idk)

>>4250122

>it doesn't matter - i removed it from notables and corrected the bun. all is good. sorry for including it, you're right it's ridiculous.

Ty for listening to anon feedback and correcting errors, baker. We all make them, what matters is how we act on them. Ty for the selfless time you put in here.