>>4249170 pb
>qt
>>4249277 pb
>are you.. actually a baker..?
>>4249398 pb
>y__e__s I am, ca__n__ bak__e__ whenever nee__d__ed, b__a__ker
>>4251673 lb
>bad form dealing with baking
>>4251762 lb
''>no not at all it actually made me smile''
Was kinda bad form, but no big, we all make mistakes.
The encouragement in the reply is the problem.
Respectfully urge anons to let sleeping dogs lie.
We don't doxx, we don't femfag.
Extremely important
Understood. You're a good man, baker.
It's only natural for good men to white knight,
one of the many ways wammins hold power.
Why risk whether one of them will abuse it?
Just take fem status off the table altogether.
Not trying to be a lecturefag, just reminding all anons to keep alert, eye on the ball. We're fatigued, easy to let down our guard. We can't afford to do that, nearing the final stretch. Attacks will only increase. We need to stay clear-thinking.
>wasn't white knighting, was fucking around
I know man, I was saying it for benefit of any anons that might be tempted to white night. As I said in prev. post, it was the encouragement in the response that was the problem, the kind of spark that can light fires.
Which is why white-night'ing in this case has been a problem b4, and BO called it specifically out as such. The nameplay & flirting has been ramping up again, I was just trying to stop the fire b4 it started.
>muh freedom to do whatever I waaant
kek. we don't doxx, and we don't femfag. those are board rules so we can preserve political freedom of speech. if that bothers you, you might be in the wrong place. Try Tinder
I'll leave it there, and let what sparks have already been set hopefully die out.