QUESTION:

There was a discussion here probably Friday night/early Sat am about these guys in black with orange armbands that look like bad news. Then this pic showed up a few breads ago in notables (>>4250580 pb), where it was billed as a claim that they are thugs hired by Macron to beat up French protesters. They DO look like thugs but the claim is made on the website of the "Friends of Syria."

Who is this group that makes this claim? Anybody know? They seem sketchy; there's no sauce at all on the website. I tried to find out more, but don't have enough background on Syria to sort out the wheat from the chaff.

>>4252982

Had this discussion in an earlier bread. The SC "denied cert"–decided not to hear the case–based on the idea that the party bringing the suit does not have "standing" to sue. I think I've got that right.

Basically, it's a procedural objection that has little or nothing to do with the content of the suit. The person writing this piece who says Kav "sides with" liberal justices is distorting the truth, by implying that he used the same reasoning they did in arriving at his position. And that is probably not true.

Ask a law fag for further clarification.

>>4252997

Not true. See >>4153139 if you're interested in why.

>>4253042

>>4253037

Look, I definitely believe it's possible that these guys are Macron's thugs. I saw these guys on the video last Fri night along with other anons; none of us thought they looked like protesters.

But I still want to know the truth in a "saucy" way, not to assume. Anyone know anything about the "Friends of Syria"? Do they have reasons for screwing up Macron? (For all we know, they could be the ones in the thugs in the pic–they beat up protesters and them blame Macron for their own reasons.)

>>4253075

Say something constructive or GTFO

>>4253107

>>4253098

The DS can't just destroy Trump with the snap of a finger. They have to do it in a way that is at least somewhat believable to the average US citizen. Until they actually take control–which will be never–they have to look "legal."

>>4253183

Something I read indicated it was about standing if I remember right. Partner was a lawfag so I picked up a little. But I know enough to challenge people making up reasons wo/having a clue about how the law works. Division shills use that tactic to attack Kav and induce doubt in patriots.

>>4253188

They ARE stupid, because they eventually do in their own families–just like in Godfather III.

>>4253182

Kek!

>>4253187

It would be a relief for a person under constant attack to be anonymous somewhere.

>>4253229

Be afraid–be very afraid

>>4253231

I'm laughing so hard I'm going to split a gut.

>>4253232

Nice smile

>>4253257

notable

There are several videos here, definitely worth seeing.

QUESTION:

Is there a way to translate twitter video into a form that can be shown here?

>>4253428

I thank God too patriot.

>>4253432

Hard to know if these are linked. The earthquake did occur right when we were in the midst of trying to decide how to respond to Q's highlighting this picture (what kind of digging to do, if any, on Antarctica). The earthquake was not actually centered in Antarctica, tho. There are so many possible threads to follow here–with some of them pretty "out there"–that it leaves people wondering.

>>4253374

Agree totally, anon. Work a lot with symbols, Jungian psychology, art. We use symbols a lot here, as well, but we think of "our" symbols as different. For anyone without that kind of background, tho, it can be hard to make fine distinctions about symbology. Maybe it would help to remind people that it's what we are inside that gives symbols their power for good or ill.

>>4253390

Yup, the quake was on this board 22 mins after it hit.

>>4253398

counterintelligence

>>4253396

Don't they wish!!!

>>4253473

I guess we'll see. Waiting is hard.

>>4253009

This "cheery newfag" thing–if I were a shill, I'd drive everyone nuts by showing up and acting like a complete idiot newfag. These posts always get lots of action. Real newfags respect it here and try hard not to look new (excluding lost normies).