Throwing this out there one more time in case there's something to it. Maybe our HistoryFags will find some merit in it.

Could the Cabal and their symbolism go back much farther in history than we are led to believe?

Here are some bullet points:

Atlantis was the capital of a ten colony empire that perished in a catastrophe 12,600 years ago.

According to Solon (and published by Plato), Egypt was a colony of Atlantis. Plato documents it in the Critias and the Timaeus

Atlantis consisted of circular rings of water and land.

Herodotus of Ancient Greece places Atlantis in North Africa on a map of the known world circa 430 BC.

The Richat Structure in North Africa closely matches the topography and size of Atlantis and many other details listed by Plato and is known today as the Eye of the Sahara and Eye of Africa.

The Hamsa, or Eye of Fatima, is used in North Africa and Middle East predominantly and closely resembles the structure.

The Eye Of Horus has many similarities and could be a reference to the Richat.

The Richat Structure was discovered by astronauts on the Gemini missions in the 1960s and is known today as the Eye of Africa and the Eye of the Sahara.

If Egypt really was a colony of the Lost city of Atlantis, Could the Eye of Horus and the Eye of Providence, sitting atop the pyramid, represent Atlantis?

Is this proof that the Cabal goes back MUCH further than 6000 years?

Here are some sources:

GREAT explanation from Bright Insight on the Richat:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDoM4BmoDQM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyV8TUlV3Ds

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5kEzxOb-3c

Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richat_Structure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamsa

Plato:

https://ascendingpassage.com/plato-atlantis-critias.htm

https://ascendingpassage.com/plato-atlantis-timaeus.htm

Business Insider:

https://www.businessinsider.com/the-eye-of-the-sahara-is-still-a-mystery-2016-7

Robert Schoch's research on the age of the Great Sphinx was one of the first clues I happened upon:

https://youtu.be/5Nf6kYum6gI

>>4254998

I think we do the best we can in our time to fight against evil. We don't just roll over and assume we are in the endtimes and let evil fester.

>>4255024

>[

This guy's story is the only one I fully believe. I spoke with him twice and he comes across as very honest and generous with his time.

>>4255070

This sealed the deal for me. No LARP has the power to have his records sealed to a judge, and his W2/paystub was legit from the dept of naval intelligence.

>>4255077

Ultimately I guess it's up to each person to decide for themselves.

Consider the saying, "You catch the most flak when you are over the target."

In the UFO community there are loads of people who contend some of the most ridiculous stories and people allow them to continue undisturbed and even support them. They sell books, videos, etc.

If they can do their thing without problems, then why is the guy who doesn't sell merchandise, who keeps out of the spotlight, save for a talk every 5-10 years get all of the people who try and discredit him for the past 30 years? Even recent youtube uploads of the guy have commenters going out of their way to discredit him.

To me that says the man is for real.

>>4255165

I don't know if Phil Schneider should be considered a gatekeeper to this knowledge or anything. My point again is this: If Phil Schneider contends all of this stuff, sells his book and is legitimate, then why would someone making a documentary on Bob Lazar mean that he isn't legitimate?

At the end of the day, I'm pretty sure most of us believe that alien contact has occurred and Q confirmed it. That's the most important point, I think.