We don't care, Chuck.
Shut it down. Shut it ALL down.
Then cry more… we love the salt.
>https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92098&page=1
Article is from 2006
I'm not sure a jury composed of retired GOP and Trump associated generals trying a case against the Hillary/Obama would be 'accepted' by the public or international community.
>I don't understand this. What is it? What does it mean?
It's an old article, from the Bush years, about setting up tribunals for accused terrorists who might be American citizens.
It's a stretch to think you could easily use the same method to try 'political opponents'.
They would need to have incredible evidence of crimes-against-humanity already released in the public sphere.
Which is perhaps the plan.
In a normal case, this would be seen as prejudicial to the jury pool.
But if you are not going to use a normal jury, then it might work.