>>425336 pb

> Q Think Graham KAV exchange.

link you dropped spoke to uncertainty how to proceed tribunals US citizens. Respectfully, POTUS should arrest the badguys, put behind bars and try before tribunal….. let the SC have at a decision. hard to countermand POTUS re: Nat Sec. deadline Jan 03 or does it matter?

>>4260427 pb

> Q #FactsMatter

Greetings Oh Great One! ty for your service. and ty for reminder what is playing out in Congress…. not a true indicator, just smoke and mirrors for the dims base. still, thx for the reality check, can always use that.

>>4257392 pb

> Q These people are stupid.

Greetings Oh Great One! very smart of POTUS to include indirect spending for wall.. and sneaky. Good move! frankly, don't see the optics of dims blocking wall/NatSec. looks like they sink their own ship. just sayin'

>>4256623 pb

> Q Border Security is National Security.

now you're talkin'. POTUS/you control narrative (as always) and this is a winner. no way dims will get any traction from obstruction/no/open borders crap. can't they see that? must be pretty stupid.. I know, you already said that.