>>4261325 (lb)

CPL is on the hook for the entire thing if POTUS chooses to collect it from him. They are jointly and severally liable for it. It was a frivolous case and CPL should never have filed it so he gets the same punishment. He is now on notice by the Courts for filing any other suit against POTUS. He if filed another frivolous case against POTUS he risks being labeled as vexatious and his penalty would be 3 times the expense and required to receive permission before filing any other lawsuit. He is basically neutered now. POTUS needs to do this with California AG

>>4261627

Here anon, enjoy! POTUS is in full control and this is a fun civil rule/procedure to understand!

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_11

>>4261751 Lawfag jr. The order came with attorney fees AND $1000 in sanctions.

Stormy came out as soon as the case was dismissed with fees awarded and claimed CPL filed without her permission. She wanted the bill hung around his neck!

CPL would have been given notice to withdraw the case in the appropriate 21 day time or else the Judge wouldn't have awarded fees and sanctions.

I don't see any other conclusion to draw from that than CPL is on the hook equally

>>4261863

withdrawal has zero to do with it

I was talking about the procedure to file a motion for sanctions under Rule 11. 21 days notice to opposing counsel that the case was without merit and intend to file for sanctions if it wasn't withdrawn