Q always says to think logically. So here is what I believe to be a logical question.

We were told months ago that the Awan brothers would be brought to justice. That seemed plausible when Imran was stopped from leaving the country and was being investigated. Awan was only charged with making a false statement on a loan application.

In a plea deal with prosecutors in July, prosecutors made the following statement:

“The Government has uncovered no evidence that your client violated federal law with respect to the House computer systems,” including stealing equipment or illegally accessing or transferring information, prosecutors wrote in an 11-page plea agreement dated and signed Tuesday."

I'm not a shill. I WANT to trust the plan. While the President using Q+ as his call sign on AF1 is cute and all, I want to know how we expect to see the likes of Hillary, Comey, Obama, etc be brought to justice when it seems these Pakistani hackers have been let off the hook.

I think that's a logical position…and I really wish Q would address something like this instead of counting deltas between tweets and board posts.

>>4264043

Cool. So you have no answer as to why we were told there would be justice and then they were let off the hook by our DOJ who said they found no wrongdoing during their time as IT folks in Congress.

It's a legitimate question. Or are you denying that?

>>4264170

Thanks for the thoughtful reply! What you described is exactly my perspective as well. Regarding the Awans, at first I thought they would come back and charge them at a later date, but the statement put out by DOJ prosecutors denied the crime that we all know they committed.

It's frustrating. I know they're (POTUS and Co) are doing all they can, but if we can't take down some foreign IT spies, how the heck can we expect to hold members of Congress and our gov accountable?

I worry we are all being far too complacent waiting for "tomorrow" or "next week."