>>4262985

Exactly.

Same with the video simulation on 9/11

It's so much more socially verboten then many other topics of discussion that are seemingly just as strange to the ordinary mind.

It's not a coincidence.

No way.

The perps fight harder against some info, than others?

Also others will tend to go along if they see someone being harassed for an opinion. They won't stand up for the underdog opinion.

That's why the Notables are always keyed to "What my relatives will be comfortable with

When you think of it that's the key to the Mainstream Media power - the instinct to conform.

On the one hand you need to learn and to listen to others.

On the other, the desire to "be right" and to "fit in" is used as a tool by the MSM. That's why so much teasing and shaming for those who support Trump. And it works.

1. They don't want to be under attack too.

2. They side with the more powerful.

3. They don't know how to think, reason or dig.

4. They never question their assumptions / beliefs.

Even on a supposedly free speech site with gross porn and animal vivisection and everything else, you'll still be teased mercilessly for an unpopular opinion. They won't just let it go. They have to stop you.

"Muh. Our reputation"

kek

>>4263819

>>4263819

Forgot again to tag Pb on the links. Sorry

About Jones - Hicks

Why doesn't he just a pseudonym as we all do when our account is banned?

All of us have that happen to us and we just go on an get another account.

He not banned from getting his opinion out on Twitter any more than we are.

In fact, I'd say the banning is worse against the "Q" movement than against Jones - Hicks followers, who are more mainstream.

He could write a book.

He has his own fucking Network. And he's bankrolled.

Boo Hoo

>>4263881

Why do you say that?

Because the whole world is under one Octopus?

>>4263747

Yes, you've got it.

That's why I wrote "OVER 50 years"

kek

>>4263747

There's a good book by Uton Sinclair called

The Brass Check

written in 1919 about "Yellow Journalism"

It's a great book free on-line

https://archive.org/details/cu31924026364251/page/n37

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Brass_Check

>>4264036

I randomly picked page 404 to spot check

and the passages there explain demonstrate that what they do to POTUS they did against people back then that they wanted to demonize

>>4264037

That's a great hash tag.

Thinking the way they organize twitter not everyone has an equal chance of being heard; no matter how good you are and how much you work.

Get up 180K views in one day and poof your account is gone./

That's how they deal with it. And that is tipping the playing field for their own particular purposes; either to influence the public how they want them to think; Or to make sure their own picks/ stars get the money.

Which is probably the same thing.

No one is stopping Jones - Hicks from putting out his opinion - But he can't be an Anon; he ego won't allow it.

And he would of his own weight without his Network behind him. That's why it was such a "tragedy" when he lost his account on Twitter.

And me and others think it was a set-up because he was losing out to "Q"

That's why he claimed first he knew Q

Then next why he claimed Q was a fraud.

Check out this photo of supposedly him and his Grandmother.

Check the crown, it's a badly shooped photo.

Check the little piper boy peeking out below.

So strange. He's a fucking creep.

>>4264236

that's what I said when I started reading up on them. Fake Fake Fake. Name if probably even fake. Unlikely to be descended from Marie Antonette either. But a likely story.

It's a thousand cons and shell game.s

Would love to see the sause on that though.

And he would SINK of his own weight without his Network behind him.

>>4264021

They want to do regime change here as they did in other countries, speaking of the Cabal C-A, but Trump is fighting them

That's what they were up to here, just what they have done elsewhere.

That's why Trump was the last chance.

It was easy in other countries because they didn't have Trump and our Military against them.

Now our Military is no longer on their side.

>>4264394

>http://time.com/4711687/john-f-kennedy-diary-hitler/

TIME magazine is comped; if that's what you are trying to do.

Why not summarize. I not clicking on TIME magazine. I know too much already for that shit.

Been there, done that. Too much a waste of TIME