TY Baker!!!
Could be. I mean, if they knew, then why not prevent? Are we seeing things that happened hours/days/weeks ago, or is Q being intentionally vague here? Do we not have white hats that could have prevented what Q apparently knew, or did Q know and did nothing? Implicative speculation at best.
2 more alternate realities here:
-
Smocking was talking about the body painting or a type of apparel that someone is wearing right now (Hillary in India, or Body painting on Podesta an others at sex parties.
-
Q knew this narrative was coming, and the shooting was a FF, and no one actually got hurt.
-
1 and 2 above, and the first narrative is just bunk. I'm leaning 3.
It's almost like Soros is trying to create an inorganic movement like the "alt-right" shit. It's all controlled opposition.
I'm certain that's all over and one with. Remember ES was forced to sit in with POTUS while NK was freed? Yeah. That chapter is over.
High IQ post.
Damn straight. Like, way long ago they were:
https://qanon.pub/#1500
https://qanon.pub/#1546
Who do you think is going to as the "Q"?
MAOA is a problem. Happens on the flip-side of things, too, you know. Just so you know, still not working.
Look, David, here's what's happening:
-
Trafficking has a market
-
That market is cornered in sex
-
That market generates $$ because people pay to see it
-
When revenues can be based on ad schemes (looks at google), you can officially offer these types of "services" for "free" (pornhub)
-
Brainwashing commences
Worked in Palestine. Why not here, right? No one's buying the bullshit. Sure, some women might fall for it, but that's because there are deeper rooter societal issues at hand that cause a rebellious lashing out. It's going to be undone because when people find out what's been happening, they will shift the Overton window so hard in the other direction, it will make your dreidel spin.
>Explain why.
Adverse to natural proclivities to in-group preference. It's a literal fetish.
>Two people having sex. Lots of posts like that on this board every day.
Not true. As a matter of fact, many anons hate the fact that tits are posted ad nauseam, but it is what it is.
>Why are mine "division shilling"?
See first explanation. That and the fact that your buddies respond to your posts to get rial up the "racism" conversation. Anons see through it.
<Misspellings are intentional, sometimes.
>The couple is beautiful … both very attractive.
Matter of preference, really.
>What makes it "division shilling"?
All the reasons explained above.